Equilibrium Interest Rate and Liquidity Premium with Transaction Costs
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we study the effects of transaction costs on asset prices. We assume an overlapping generations economy with two riskless assets. The first asset is liquid while the second asset carries proportional transaction costs. We show that agents buy the liquid asset for short-term investment and the illiquid asset for long-term investment. When transaction costs increase, the price of the liquid asset increases. The price of the illiquid asset decreases if the asset is in small supply, but may increase if the supply is large. These results have implications for the effects of transaction taxes and commission deregulation. ∗Vayanos: MIT Sloan School of Management, 50 Memorial Drive E52-437, Cambridge MA 02142-1347, tel 617-2532956, e-mail [email protected]. Vila: Convergence Asset Management, 475 Steamboat Road, Greenwich CT 06830, tel 203-8632000. We thank Darrell Duffie, Phil Dybvig, Mark Gertler, John Heaton, David Kreps, Jose Scheinkman, Costis Skiadas, and Jean Tirole, seminar participants at Berkeley, Ecole des Ponts, Georgetown University, MIT, New York University, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, University Carlos III, Washington University, and Wharton, and participants at the NBER Asset Pricing, Econometric Society, and Society of Economic Dynamics and Control conferences for very helpful comments. We also thank Minh Chau, Lee-Bath Nelson, and Muhamet Yildiz for excellent research assistance. The opinions expressed in this paper are the opinions of the authors only, and are not represented as being the opinions of Convergence Asset Management.
منابع مشابه
Asset prices in general equilibrium with recursive utility and illiquidity induced by transactions costs
In this paper, we study the effect of proportional transaction costs on consumptionportfolio decisions and asset prices in a dynamic general equilibrium economy with a financial market that has a single-period bond and two risky stocks, one of which incurs the transaction cost. Our model has multiple investors with stochastic labor income, heterogeneous beliefs, and heterogeneous Epstein-Zin-We...
متن کاملTransaction costs, trading volume, and the liquidity premium
In a market with one safe and one risky asset, an investor with a long horizon, constant investment opportunities, and constant relative risk aversion trades with small proportional transaction costs. We derive explicit formulas for the optimal investment policy, its implied welfare, liquidity premium, and trading volume. At the first order, the liquidity premium equals the spread, times share ...
متن کاملMarket Closure and the Liquidity Premium Puzzle
In contrast to empirical evidence, standard theories conclude that transaction costs only have a second order effect on liquidity premia. In this paper, we show that if one incorporates the well-established fact that market volatility during trading periods is significantly higher than during nontrading periods, then transaction costs have a first order effect that is much greater than that fou...
متن کاملA topic of current interest: Bonds or bond funds?
■ Individual bonds can provide certain benefits over funds, and these advantages mostly have to do with a preference for control over security-specific decisions. The cost of these advantages can be thought of as a “control premium” that is reflected in generally higher (or additional) transaction costs, lower liquidity, more limited return opportunities, and higher bond portfolio risk. The con...
متن کاملMarket Closure , Liquidity Premia , and Return Predictability ∗
In his seminal work, Constantinides (1986) finds that transaction cost has only a second order effect on liquidity premia. In this paper, we show that incorporating the well-established time-varying return dynamics across trading and nontrading periods can produce a first order effect that is much greater than that found by the existing literature and comparable to empirical evidence. Surprisin...
متن کامل